Ringgie Anak Ampas v Public Prosecutor

Court of Appeal · · Criminal Law

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Ringgie Anak Ampas v Public Prosecutor
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date19 October 2022
Date Uploaded2 October 2025
Legal TopicsCriminal Law
Parties

Appellant(s): Ringgie Anak Ampas

Respondent(s):

  • Pendakwa Raya
  • [Pendakwa Raya]
Bench
  • YA Dato' Has Zanah Binti Mehat
  • YA Datuk Supang Lian
  • YA Dato' Sri Mariana binti Haji Yahya
Facts & Background
  • The appellant was convicted by the High Court for the murder of his brother under Section 302 of the Penal Code and sentenced to death.
  • The incident occurred after the deceased quarrelled with his daughter, during which he slapped her twice, prompting the appellant to shoot him with a shotgun.
  • The appellant claimed he heard screams, assumed the deceased's wife and daughter were dead, lost self-control, and was provoked into shooting the deceased.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the High Court erred in finding that the appellant failed to establish the defence of grave and sudden provocation under Exception 1 to Section 300 of the Penal Code.
  • Whether the deceased's quarrelling and shouting with his wife and daughter constituted grave and sudden provocation sufficient to deprive a reasonable man of self-control.
  • Whether the appellant's act of shooting the deceased with a shotgun was a proportionate response to the alleged provocation, judged by the standard of a reasonable man.
Decision
  • The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's conviction and sentence.
  • The Court found no error in the High Court's conclusion that the appellant failed to prove grave and sudden provocation on a balance of probabilities.
  • The Court held that the appellant's reaction was disproportionate and not that of a reasonable man, and that the elements of murder under Section 300(c) of the Penal Code were satisfied.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!