Parameshwaren a/l K. Kumara v Pendakwa Raya

Court of Appeal · · Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Parameshwaren a/l K. Kumara v Pendakwa Raya
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date26 August 2025
Date Uploaded2 December 2025
Legal TopicsCriminal Law, Criminal Procedure
Parties

Appellant(s): Parameshwaren A/L K.Kumara

Respondent(s): Pendakwa Raya

Bench
  • YA Dato' Lim Chong Fong
  • YA Dato' Azmi Bin Ariffin
  • Dato' Dr. Choo Kah Sing
Facts & Background
  • The appellant was charged in the High Court with trafficking 62.4 grams of Methamphetamine under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952.
  • The prosecution established a prima facie case, leading the appellant to be called to enter his defence, where he testified and called two other witnesses.
  • The High Court found the appellant guilty, convicting and sentencing him to life imprisonment (30 years) and 12 strokes of the cane, against which he appealed to the Court of Appeal.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the trial judge erred in applying the correct burden of proof regarding the possession and trafficking of dangerous drugs at the defence stage.
  • Whether the appellant was denied a fair trial due to the absence of a Tamil interpreter during the testimony of prosecution witnesses.
  • Whether the dangerous drugs were found on the appellant's person or at a separate location during a second raid, thereby challenging the credibility of the prosecution's main witness and the overall prosecution case.
Decision
  • The Court found no merit in the argument regarding the burden of proof, affirming that the trial judge correctly applied the presumption of trafficking and that any hypothetical mention of "direct trafficking" did not prejudice the appellant.
  • The Court held that the appellant was not denied a fair trial, given his proficiency in Bahasa Malaysia and representation by experienced counsel throughout the proceedings.
  • The Court upheld the trial judge's finding that the 9 packets of drugs were found on the appellant, rejecting the defence's inconsistent claims, lack of corroboration for allegations of police misconduct, and the appellant's failure to rebut the statutory presumption of trafficking.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!