Ooi Thye Peng v Pendaftar Besar Kelahiran dan Kematian Malaysia & Ors

Court of Appeal · · Constitutional & Administrative Law

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Ooi Thye Peng v Pendaftar Besar Kelahiran dan Kematian Malaysia & Ors
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date10 November 2025
Date Uploaded3 April 2026
Legal TopicsConstitutional & Administrative Law
Parties

Appellant(s): OOI THYE PiNG

Respondent(s):

  • Pendaftar Besar Kelahiran Dan Kematian Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara Malaysia
  • Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara
  • Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Dalam Negeri
  • Kerajaan Malaysia
Bench
  • YAA Datuk Hajah Azizah binti Haji Nawawi
  • YA Dato' Mohd Nazlan Bin Mohd Ghazali
  • YA Datuk Azhahari Kamal bin Ramli
Facts & Background
  • The appellant sought citizenship under Article 14(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution, citing birth in Malaysia and other provisions.
  • The appellant was adopted at four months old, with his biological mother identified only as "Susila" and his biological father unknown.
  • Despite attempts to register his birth and obtain citizenship, the appellant's applications were unsuccessful.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the appellant, born in Malaysia to unknown biological parents, qualifies for citizenship under Article 14(1)(b) read with various sections of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution.
  • Whether the appellant met the requirements of *jus soli* and *jus sanguinis* for citizenship by operation of law.
  • Whether the appellant could be considered a "newborn child found exposed" under Section 19B of Part III of the Second Schedule.
Decision
  • The Court of Appeal affirmed the High Court's decision, finding no appealable error.
  • The appellant failed to prove that either of his biological parents was a Malaysian citizen or permanent resident at the time of his birth, thus not satisfying the *jus sanguinis* requirement.
  • The appellant was not considered a "found exposed" child as he was handed over for adoption by his biological mother, not abandoned.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!