Omar bin Mammah v Minister of Local Government and Housing of the State of Sabah & Anor

Court of Appeal · · Constitutional & Administrative Law, Employment Law

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Omar bin Mammah v Minister of Local Government and Housing of the State of Sabah & Anor
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date9 September 2025
Date Uploaded11 September 2025
Legal TopicsConstitutional & Administrative Law, Employment Law
Parties

Appellant(s): Omar Bin Mammah

Respondent(s):

  • Minister of Local Government and Housing of the State of Sabah
  • Ministry of Local Government and Housing of the State of Sabah
Bench
  • YA Dato' Ahmad Zaidi Bin Ibrahim
  • YA Datuk Mohamed Zaini Bin Mazlan
  • YA Dato Alwi Bin Abdul Wahab
Facts & Background
  • The appellant was appointed as "Penasihat Teknikal" and subsequently as President of Majlis Perbandaran Tawau (MPT) for a two-year contract term.
  • Barely three months into his term as President of MPT, the appellant received a letter from the second respondent informing him that his term was reduced, effective retrospectively, with one month's salary in lieu of notice.
  • The appellant filed a judicial review application, seeking a declaration that the respondents' action was illegal, ultra vires, and a breach of contract, arguing he was constructively dismissed without being heard.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the first and second respondents possessed the legal authority under Section 8 of the Tawau Municipal Council Instrument 1983 to reduce the appellant's tenure as President of MPT.
  • Whether the reduction of the appellant's tenure amounted to an unlawful dismissal or a breach of contract, particularly in light of Article 135(2) of the Federal Constitution regarding the right to be heard.
  • Whether the respondents were the correct parties to be sued, given that the Sabah State Public Service Commission (SPANS) was the appointing authority for the State Public Service.
Decision
  • The Court affirmed the High Court's finding that the respondents were not the authority responsible for the appellant's appointment or termination from the State Public Service.
  • The Court held that SPANS, as the appointing authority for the State Public Service, had the power to reduce the appellant's tenure as "Penasihat Teknikal" under Clause 9 of his contract, which allowed termination with notice or salary in lieu.
  • The Court concluded that the appellant's appointment as President of MPT was contingent on his membership in the State Public Service, and thus, SPANS's termination of his "Penasihat Teknikal" role effectively and lawfully terminated his MPT presidency. The appeal was dismissed.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!