Muhammad Hafiz bin Ab Rashid v Pendakwa Raya

Court of Appeal · · Criminal Law

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Muhammad Hafiz bin Ab Rashid v Pendakwa Raya
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date23 September 2025
Date Uploaded24 September 2025
Legal TopicsCriminal Law
Parties

Appellant(s): Muhammad Hafiz Bin Ab Rashid

Respondent(s): Pendakwa Raya

Bench
  • YA Dato' Hashim Bin Hamzah
  • YA Dato' Paduka Azman Bin Abdullah
  • YA Dato' Azmi Bin Ariffin
Facts & Background
  • The appellant, a Syariah lawyer, was charged under Section 408 of the Penal Code for criminal breach of trust, accused of dishonestly taking RM7,000 from a client for personal use.
  • The Session Court found the appellant guilty, imposing a two-year imprisonment, two strokes of the cane, and a RM5,000 fine, which the High Court subsequently affirmed.
  • The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal against the conviction and sentence, challenging the findings of both lower Courts.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the appellant was an employee of the firm Tetuan Akberdin & Co. at the material time (March 16, 2012) when the alleged criminal breach of trust occurred.
  • Whether the appellant was entrusted with the RM7,000 on behalf of Tetuan Akberdin & Co., thereby establishing the element of "entrustment" under Section 408 of the Penal Code.
  • Whether the prosecution had proven the element of "dishonesty" beyond reasonable doubt, considering the client's actions and the appellant's defence.
Decision
  • The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellant was not an employee of Tetuan Akberdin & Co. on the material date, as evidenced by his resignation letter and the cessation of salary/EPF contributions from February 2012.
  • The Court held that the client had explicitly appointed the appellant from Tetuan Irsamuddin Hafiz & Associates through a 'wakalah' document, and receipts for the RM7,000 payment were issued by the latter firm.
  • Consequently, the essential element of "entrustment" of the money to the appellant on behalf of Tetuan Akberdin & Co. was not proven, rendering the conviction unsafe. The conviction and sentence were set aside, and the appellant was acquitted.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!