Mohammad Firdaus bin Ismail v Pendakwa Raya

Court of Appeal · · Criminal Procedure

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Mohammad Firdaus bin Ismail v Pendakwa Raya
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date26 August 2024
Date Uploaded23 September 2025
Legal TopicsCriminal Procedure
Parties

Appellant(s): Mohammad Firdaus Bin Ismail

Respondent(s):

  • Pendakwa Raya
  • [Pendakwa Raya]
Bench
  • YA Dato' Ahmad Zaidi Bin Ibrahim
  • YA Datuk Mohamed Zaini Bin Mazlan
  • YA Datuk Noorin binti Badaruddin
Facts & Background
  • The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 of the Penal Code by the High Court and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
  • The deceased was the appellant's mother, whose body was found in a septic tank outside their home, having sustained severe injuries including incised and stab wounds.
  • The appellant initially appealed against both conviction and sentence but later withdrew the appeal against conviction, proceeding only on the sentence.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the mandatory death sentence imposed by the High Court should be replaced with a term of imprisonment, considering the recent amendments to the law.
  • What would be an appropriate alternative sentence of imprisonment and whipping, if the death penalty is set aside.
  • The application of the judicial discretion granted to the Court by the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2022 (Act 846) and the amended Section 302 of the Penal Code.
Decision
  • The Court allowed the appeal against the sentence, setting aside the death penalty and substituting it with a sentence of forty (40) years imprisonment, effective from the date of arrest, and twelve (12) strokes of whipping.
  • The Court exercised its discretion under the newly enacted Act 846, which abolished the mandatory death penalty, noting that the amended Section 302 of the Penal Code now provides for alternative sentences of imprisonment and whipping.
  • The Court affirmed that the death penalty should be reserved for the "rarest of the rare" or "most exceptionally serious, foul, shocking murders," and found that the prosecution failed to demonstrate that the appellant's crime warranted the death penalty, especially considering the mitigating factors and the family's forgiveness.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!