Lau Lai Seng & Anor v Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran Negara & Ors

Court of Appeal · · Constitutional & Administrative Law

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Lau Lai Seng & Anor v Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran Negara & Ors
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date12 November 2025
Date Uploaded3 April 2026
Legal TopicsConstitutional & Administrative Law
Parties

Appellant(s):

  • Lau Lai Leng
  • LAU WEI SIANG (Seorang kanak-kanak yang menuntut melalui Bapa Kandung yang sah di sisi undang-undang dan wakil litigasi, Lau Lai Leng)

Respondent(s):

  • Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara
  • Menteri Dalam Negeri Malaysia
  • Kerajaan Malaysia
Bench
  • YAA Datuk Hajah Azizah binti Haji Nawawi
  • YA Dato' Mohd Nazlan Bin Mohd Ghazali
  • YA Datuk Azhahari Kamal bin Ramli
Facts & Background
  • The second plaintiff, an illegitimate child, was born in Malaysia to the first plaintiff (a Malaysian citizen) and a Cambodian mother who were not legally married.
  • The child was registered as a non-citizen, and a subsequent application for citizenship under Article 15A of the Federal Constitution was rejected.
  • Following DNA confirmation of the first plaintiff as the biological father, the plaintiffs initiated an originating summons seeking a declaration of the child's Malaysian citizenship by operation of law.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the illegitimate child was a citizen by operation of law under Article 14(1)(b) read with Part II, Section 1(e) and Section 2(3) of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution.
  • Whether the illegitimate child was a citizen by operation of law under Article 14(1)(b) read with Part II, Section 1(a) of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution.
  • Whether proof of *jus sanguinis* (citizenship by lineage) is required for these provisions, and how Section 17 of Part III of the Second Schedule (illegitimate child follows mother's citizenship) applies.
Decision
  • The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision that both *jus soli* (place of birth) and *jus sanguinis* (lineage) must be proven for citizenship under Section 1(e) and Section 2(3).
  • The Court, bound by the Federal Court's decision in *CTEB & Anor*, held that for an illegitimate child, *jus sanguinis* is traced through the biological mother as per Section 17 of Part III of the Second Schedule.
  • As the biological mother was a non-citizen and Cambodian law allowed the child to acquire Cambodian citizenship, the child failed to prove he was "not born a citizen of any country" under Section 1(e) or that his "parents" (meaning mother) were Malaysian citizens under Section 1(a).
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!