Kamaruddin Bin Abd Rahim v Pendakwa Raya

Court of Appeal · · Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Kamaruddin Bin Abd Rahim v Pendakwa Raya
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date28 August 2024
Date Uploaded23 July 2025
Legal TopicsCriminal Law, Criminal Procedure
Parties

Appellant(s): Kamaruddin Bin Abd Rahim

Respondent(s):

  • Pendakwa Raya
  • [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara]
Bench
  • YA Dato' Ahmad Zaidi Bin Ibrahim
  • YA Datuk Mohamed Zaini Bin Mazlan
  • YA Datuk Noorin binti Badaruddin
Facts & Background
  • The appellant was charged with murder under Section 302 of the Penal Code, convicted by the High Court, and sentenced to death by hanging.
  • The High Court Judicial Commissioner took over the trial after another High Court Judge had heard a significant portion of the prosecution's case.
  • The appellant appealed against both the conviction and the sentence imposed by the High Court.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the High Court correctly found a prima facie case for murder, including the credibility of prosecution witnesses and the proof of intent.
  • Whether the High Court erred in rejecting the appellant's defence, particularly regarding grave and sudden provocation and the involvement of a third party.
  • Whether the death sentence was appropriate, considering the enactment of the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 and the High Court's rejection of the appellant's recusal application.
Decision
  • The Court dismissed the appeal against conviction, affirming the High Court's findings that a prima facie case was established and the charge was proven beyond reasonable doubt.
  • The Court found no appellable error in the High Court's assessment of witness credibility, acceptance of the appellant's written statement, or rejection of the appellant's recusal application.
  • The Court allowed the appeal against sentence, setting aside the death penalty and substituting it with 30 years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane, effective from the date of arrest.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!