Gunasegaran a/l Munisamy v Pendakwa Raya

Court of Appeal · · Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Gunasegaran a/l Munisamy v Pendakwa Raya
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date25 June 2024
Date Uploaded24 July 2025
Legal TopicsCriminal Law, Criminal Procedure
Parties

Appellant(s): Gunasegaran A/l Munisamy

Respondent(s):

  • Pendakwa Raya
  • [Pendakwa Raya]
Bench
  • YA Dato' Che Mohd Ruzima Bin Ghazali
  • YA Dato' Ahmad Zaidi Bin Ibrahim
  • YA Dato' Azizul Azmi Bin Adnan
Facts & Background
  • The appellant was charged with murder under section 302 of the Penal Code for causing the death of the deceased on 5 February 2018.
  • The High Court found the appellant guilty of the charge and sentenced him to death by hanging.
  • Aggrieved by the decision, the appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal against both the conviction and the sentence.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the High Court erred in finding that the prosecution had established a prima facie case at the close of its evidence.
  • Whether the High Court erred in concluding that the defence failed to raise reasonable doubt against the prosecution's case, and that the prosecution had proven the charge beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Whether the death sentence imposed by the High Court was appropriate given the circumstances and recent legislative changes.
Decision
  • The Court unanimously dismissed the appellant's appeal against conviction, affirming the High Court's finding that a prima facie case was established and that the defence failed to raise reasonable doubt.
  • The Court upheld the High Court's assessment of the prosecution's evidence, including the agreed facts under section 172A(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and its finding regarding the appellant's intent under section 300(c) of the Penal Code.
  • The Court allowed the appeal against sentence, setting aside the death penalty and substituting it with 35 years imprisonment from the date of arrest and 15 strokes of the cane, in line with the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!