Dr Jerilee Mariam Khong & Ors v Yusnita binti Johari

Court of Appeal · · Medical Negligence

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Dr Jerilee Mariam Khong & Ors v Yusnita binti Johari
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date1 April 2024
Date Uploaded31 July 2025
Legal TopicsMedical Negligence
Parties

Appellant(s):

  • Dr Jerilee Mariam Khong
  • Dr Senthi A/L N. Muthuraman

Respondent(s): Yusnita Binti Johari (Menyaman Melalui Suami Dan Wakil Litigasinya Khairil Faiz Bin Rahamat)

Bench
  • YA Datuk Seri Kamaludin Bin Md. Said
  • YA Dato' Hashim Bin Hamzah
  • YA Datuk Wong Kian Kheong
Facts & Background
  • The plaintiff, pregnant and diagnosed with Placenta Praevia Type III Posterior, underwent an emergency Caesarean section and subsequently suffered a collapse, leading to severe and irreversible brain damage.
  • She initiated a suit against 16 medical practitioners and the Government (the 17th defendant) for medical negligence and breach of contract.
  • The High Court found all defendants liable for the plaintiff's brain damage and awarded substantial damages.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the "Egg-Shell Skull" rule applies in medical negligence cases to reduce liability based on a patient's pre-existing health condition.
  • Whether the High Court erred in its findings of medical negligence against specific medical practitioners and the Government, and in the scope of liability for the non-joined party.
  • Whether the quantum of damages awarded was excessive or based on incorrect principles, particularly regarding future medical treatment available for free in Government hospitals.
Decision
  • The Court affirmed the liability of the 2nd, 3rd, and 7th to 12th individual defendants and the 17th defendant (Government), holding that the "Egg-Shell Skull" rule does not reduce liability if the negligence materially contributed to the injury, and the plaintiff's pre-existing condition was not "fault" under the Civil Law Act 1956.
  • The suit was dismissed against the 1st, 4th to 6th, and 13th to 16th individual defendants due to a lack of evidence of negligence against them.
  • The Court substantially reduced the quantum of damages, finding several awards "so extremely high" or too remote, and adjusted the pre-judgment interest rate from 8% to 5% per annum.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!