Afeef Abdulqader Mansoor v Pentadbir Tanah WPKL

Court of Appeal · · Land & Property Law

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This digest provides AI-generated summaries of recent Malaysian legal judgments and is provided for general informational purposes only. The digest may contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies, and does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel. For complete and authoritative information, always consult a qualified legal professional and refer to official court sources (here) or the full text of original judgments. The providers of this digest accept no responsibility or liability for any loss and/or damage resulting from reliance on its contents.

Afeef Abdulqader Mansoor v Pentadbir Tanah WPKL
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date3 November 2025
Date Uploaded14 November 2025
Legal TopicsLand & Property Law
Parties

Appellant(s): Afeef Abdulqader Mansoor

Respondent(s): Pentadbir Tanah Wpkl

Bench
  • YA Dato' Paduka Azman Bin Abdullah
  • YA Datuk Azhahari Kamal bin Ramli
  • YA Dato Alwi Bin Abdul Wahab
Facts & Background
  • The appellant's land, which previously had a double-storey house, was acquired by the respondent Land Administrator in 2014 for hill slope rehabilitation.
  • The house on the scheduled land was demolished in 2012 by DBKL following a landslide, 16 months prior to the gazette of the land acquisition.
  • The appellant sought additional compensation for the demolished house and chattels, claiming injurious affection, but the Land Administrator's award only compensated for the vacant land.
Issues for the Court
  • Whether the compensation awarded by the Land Administrator was adequate, particularly regarding the value of the residential building and its contents lost due to a prior landslide.
  • Whether the loss of the building due to the landslide could be classified as "injurious affection" under Section 2(d) of the First Schedule of the Land Acquisition Act 1960.
  • Whether a land reference proceeding is the proper forum to determine losses arising from a landslide that occurred prior to the acquisition.
Decision
  • The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision that the loss of the building due to the landslide could not be considered "injurious affection" under the Act.
  • The Court held that "injurious affection" under Section 2(d) of the First Schedule of the Act specifically refers to damage sustained *at the time of the Land Administrator's taking possession of the land by reason of the acquisition*.
  • The Court affirmed that land reference proceedings are not the appropriate forum to determine losses arising from events (like a landslide) that occurred prior to and were not caused by the land acquisition.
Link to JudgmentView Full Judgment

Related judgments

📬 Found this useful?

Get daily AI-generated summaries of Malaysian legal judgments from the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal straight to your inbox, free!